Friday, March 6 (ECR) – The state of imaging equipment in Europe is alarming and a panel of experts will confront the issue today during a Professional Challenges session on problems impeding the harmonisation of imaging standards in Europe.
The older the equipment, the lower the quality of imaging. According to the European Coordination Committee of the Radiological Electromedical and Healthcare IT Industry (COCIR), equipment is rapidly ageing in Europe. In the EU, 60% of CT machines were up to five years old in 2008; in 2013, the number dropped to 49.5%.
To tackle the issue, the ESR published a position paper on machine renewal, stating that equipment less than five years old is state-of-the-art technology. Equipment between six and ten years old that is properly maintained is suitable for practice, but radiology departments should develop a strategy to replace them. Machines over ten years old must be replaced.
Today’s speakers will elaborate on the ESR’s analysis of the public procurement process across Europe, which is highly variable in complexity from country to country.
“The ESR’s paper might be in many instances a crucial reference in talks with hospital authorities and the government when dealing with the important topic of equipment renewal, which represents a huge problem in many countries and departments,” said Prof. Boris Brkljačić, chair of the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, and head of the ESR’s Communication and External Affairs Committee.
Distribution of equipment is also problematic in Europe. For instance in Croatia, small institutions are sometimes better equipped than large centres who treat trauma patients and require the most modern CT scanners. The problem stems from local issues surrounding renewal. Public procurement through the tender process is long-winded, sometimes taking up to one year. Moreover, because of the lack of clarity in the process, tenders often fail when unsuccessful bidders file complaints about minor legal points, Brkljačić explained.
The financial crisis has hit some European countries harder than others. But health budgets were already being allocated very differently across the EU before it occurred, according to data collected by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2012.
Among the least equipped countries were Hungary (2.8 MR units and 7.7 CT scanners per million population) Romania, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, and perhaps more surprisingly, France and the United Kingdom. On the contrary, Greece, Cyprus and Italy were among the countries with the highest numbers of machines; Italy being the highest with 24.6 MRI units, and Greece having the most CT equipment with 34.8 CT scanners per million population.
Speakers will stress the need to modernise imaging equipment across Europe, and highlight the importance of developing key quality and safety indicators and supporting them through investing in education and training.
Boris Brkljačić, Zagreb, Croatia
Professional Challenges Session
Friday, March 6, 16:00–17:30, Room F2
PC 12a Harmonised approach for imaging in Europe: myth or reality?
- Chairman’s introduction
L. Donoso; Barcelona/ES
- Current heterogeneities in imaging in Europe
G. Frija; Paris/FR
- Imaging equipment: an ESR perspective
B. Brkljačić; Zagreb/HR
- Equipment age – COCIR
N. Denjoy; Brussels/BE
- Training and certification
B. Ertl-Wagner; Munich/DE
- Issues related to coding terminology and IT access
P. Mildenberger; Mainz/DE
- Panel discussion: A global plan for imaging
J. Griebel; Neuherberg/DE (HERCA Chair of the Working Group on Medical Applications – BfS, Germany)
T. Peetso; Brussels/BE (Policy Officer of Unit ‘Health and Wellbeing’ – DG CNECT, European Commission)
A. Rys; Brussels/BE (Director Health systems and products – DG SANCO, European Commission)
G. Simeonov; Luxembourg/LU (Policy Officer Radiation Protection Unit – DG ENER, European Commission)
This 16-slice multislice CT scanner was installed at the University Hospital Dubrava in Zagreb a decade ago. It is still functioning, but should be replaced.
Copyright: © Prof. Boris Brkljačić, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb